Wisest of the crowds

Looking for a great buy-rent analysis tool? Go no further the the New York Times. My friend Kevin Boer blogged about it here, and I have to further endorse this product. Very cool Ajax interface and has all the things you need to understand the issues. Warning! Do not accept their base assumptions, some of which are in “Advanced Settings”, “General”. The main value to a tool like this is playing with different assumptions so that you can understand the real drivers. I have inputted some assumptions below based on a friends analysis of spending $6,850 to rent a house that might ordinarily cost him $2 million in San Francisco (yes, these are real numbers…it is that expensive here!).

Three Key Assumptions:

- Housing Value increase 4% per annum

- Rent increases 2% per annum (San Francisco is largely rent controlled)

- Investment returns of 6.5%

You can see there is no scenario that allows one to buy versus rent. So what does it take to get the buy-rent math to justify buying? Well if you increase housing prices to 5% increases per year then you get a break-even point of 7 years and if you increase it to 6% then you get a break-even point of 3 years. Although I held investment returns constant at 6.5%, prices increases for housing coincide with general returns in assets so realistically I should probably be increasing investment returns with any increase in house price appreciation . Why is this relationship so important? Because when you have money tied up in your house, that money is no longer available to invest. If you are a crappy investor no problem. If you know your way around, this makes the math even more difficult. So if I increase investment returns to match my original assumptions of 4% appreciation and 6.5% investment returns (2.5% spread), then the following buy-rent trade-off emerges:

So buying is better after 5 years but the gets worse at year 15. Why? Compounding. It seems the real issue is what is the relationship between housing returns and investment returns…something I will blog about in the future.

What was my recommendation to my friend? Rent and look for a distressed seller.

Local Resources:

San Francisco Assessor-Recorder

City of San Francisco Rent Board

The National Association of Realtors reported existing homes sales today (the press release). The data was scary and probably indicated the first quarter activity was a knee-jerk reaction by consumers who were sidelined the previous quarter. Of course this didn’t stop the NAR from spinning it as Matt Carter at InmanBlog noted in his excellent post, “Again with the weather”.

Here are the facts:

- Nationally, sales declined 8.4% versus last month and is down 11.3% versus last year.
- The West was hit hardest, being down 9.1% versus last month and down a whopping 16.7% versus last year.

- Median prices were up 1.6% nationally but down 1.8% in the west versus last month

- Inventory declined 60k units (1.5%) to 3.75 million units but because of faster declining sales, the number of months of supply actually increased to 7.3 from 6.8 a month earlier.
- This monthly decline was the largest since 1989 according to the Associated Press via MSNBC and the NYT

What does this all mean? Probably just that there was a “dead cat bounce” in interest in the first quarter of 2007 after the unbelievably slow fourth quarter of 2006. This happens all the time in financial markets where people attempt to bottom pick a falling market resulting in a series of rapid, but ultimately unsustainable, bounces. If this is in fact a dead cat bounce, look for prices to go substantially lower. From my experience as a trader, it will only be when people loose hope that a bottoms in prices gets set. Did you know that more people lost money in the 1929 crash buying stocks 50% below their peak?
Having said all this, markets are hyper-local and what’s true generally can be completely untrue for your neighborhood or street. If you live where new supply is negligible and high-paying jobs abundant and secure, don’t sweat it. If you live in a place where new construction in plentiful and excessive credit rampant, look out (sorry Florida)!

Side note: My-Currency markets are predicting lower prices in many san francisco zip codes over the next 3-6 months. An example for 94117 (Haight, Alamo, Ashbury Heights, Cole Valley)